Do you look forward to Samsung smartphones that are no longer the best? We have the Exynos 2400 compared against the Dimensity 9300.
When discussing Exynos, our comparison is typically limited to Samsung devices. However, Meizu and Vivo have used Samsung’s Exynos chips and offered their own iteration. On the other hand, the Dimensity 9300 is widely adopted by various smartphone manufacturers.
MediaTek was once considered a last-resort option for vendors when choosing a chipset. However, the landscape has changed. MediaTek now holds a strong reputation for both performance and efficiency. The company offers the latest process nodes during manufacturing and the latest Mali GPUs, making it highly competitive with other manufacturers.
The Exynos from Samsung was their second option for their flagship smartphone (except the S6 Series). Historically, in the EU region, India, and other markets, the Exynos variant was intentionally marketed.
When the Snapdragon variant is compared to the Exynos, the results always favor the Snapdragon variant, despite the Exynos being in-house. However, things changed after Samsung collaborated with AMD for graphics. The partnership has brought promising improvements to Exynos chips.
In this article, we compare the Exynos 2400 and Dimensity 9300 based on real-world use cases and official specifications. Let’s dive in.
Exynos 2400
Specifications
Weaknesses
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
Final Verdict: Exynos 2400 vs Dimensity 9300
Both the SoCs are highly capable, but they are pretty different. There are a few things to consider before buying, such as:
Specifications for both the chips
Looking For More Related to Tech?
We provide the latest news and “How To’s” for Tech content. Meanwhile, you may check out the following articles related to PC GPUs, CPU and GPU comparisons, mobile phones, and more:
